The question gets asked as though the answer is national. It is not. Some markets have more inventory than demand and returns have compressed accordingly. Others still support the numbers that made this asset class interesting. The useful version of the question is which properties still work and why.
What has actually changed
- Supply. Nearly every established market has more listings than it did three years ago. Guests have more choices and price transparency is total.
- Financing costs. Debt service is a larger share of the expense stack than it was in the cheapest borrowing years, which compresses cash flow at a given price.
- Insurance. The most underappreciated change. In coastal and wildfire exposed markets, premium increases have made otherwise sound properties uneconomic. See the insurance guide.
- Guest expectations. What was a differentiator three years ago is now a baseline requirement.
- Regulation. More markets have rules, and more of those rules have teeth.
What has not changed
- Differentiated inventory still outperforms. Supply growth compresses the bottom of the market first, because commodity properties compete only on price.
- Drive-to markets remain resilient relative to fly-to markets when travel budgets tighten.
- Large properties face thinner competition, because fewer exist and their guests compare against hotel blocks.
- The tax mechanics are intact. The seven day carve out and material participation are the same provisions they have been, and for a high earner that is frequently the larger part of the return.
Profitability is a property question, not a market question
The properties that struggle are commodity inventory bought at peak comparables. We underwrite against softening rather than against last year.
Apply NowWho is struggling and why
The properties in trouble share a profile. They are commodity inventory: two or three bedrooms, no meaningful differentiation, in a market that added supply quickly, purchased at a price that capitalized peak comparable performance, with a debt service assumption from a cheaper borrowing period and an insurance estimate that was a percentage rather than a quote.
That combination fails in a softening market and would have been marginal in a strong one. It is not evidence that the asset class stopped working. It is evidence that underwriting matters more now than it did when a rising tide covered modeling errors. See market saturation.
What still works
- Differentiated properties in proven markets, where demand has depth and the property has a reason to be chosen.
- Larger properties serving groups, reunions, and multi family travel where competing inventory is thin.
- Markets with multiple demand seasons rather than a single twelve week peak.
- Conservative underwriting, meaning a softening rate assumption, quoted insurance, reassessed property tax, and cleaning modeled per turnover.
- Buyers with a tax objective, for whom the first year deduction is a material part of the return and who therefore need the property to be sound rather than spectacular.
The honest summary
Short-term rentals are a normal real estate business now rather than an arbitrage. That means returns come from buying well, operating competently, and choosing markets carefully, which is how every mature asset class works. The people who did well when anything worked are not the people doing well now, and that is a healthy development rather than a warning sign. See the seven filters we run.
My BnB Accelerator, LLC is a real estate acquisition firm, not a CPA firm, and nothing here is tax advice. Figures are internal underwriting averages, not guarantees. Our tax partner is AE Tax Advisors, an independent firm.
Keep reading
Frequently asked questions
Is the short-term rental market still profitable?
It depends on the property and the market rather than on the asset class. Differentiated properties in markets with multiple demand seasons still support strong returns. Commodity inventory bought at peak comparables in rapidly supplied markets has compressed, which is how mature asset classes behave.
What has changed most for short-term rental investors?
Supply growth in nearly every established market, higher financing costs than the cheapest borrowing years, sharply higher insurance in coastal and wildfire exposed markets, guest expectations that turned yesterday's differentiators into baseline requirements, and more regulation with more enforcement.
What kind of short-term rentals are struggling?
Commodity properties: two or three bedrooms with no meaningful differentiation, in markets that added supply quickly, purchased at prices that capitalized peak comparable performance, with debt service assumptions from a cheaper period and insurance estimated as a percentage rather than quoted.
What still works in short-term rentals?
Differentiated properties in proven markets, larger properties serving groups where competing inventory is thin, markets with multiple demand seasons, conservative underwriting that assumes softening rates and uses quoted insurance, and buyers for whom the tax position is a material part of the return.